Official Style Subpage
Note: Do not confuse the Official Style with English as an Official Language, which is a political movement, largely motivated by discrimination and a fear of otherness, that wants to make English the only language in a particular country.
Some people refer to it as Bureaucratic Language, some might just label it Corporate Jargon, but Richard Lanham’s term of Official Style seems most accurate. Official language and academic language clearly overlap, but there are significant differences. Academic language typically needs to be complex because it is dealing with complex subject matter. Compare the general descriptions below with Lanham’s description of the official style. On the left you see general guidelines, but on the right, you see more negative descriptions of what writers would see as problems.
Academic Style
Use of Formal Language
Impersonal (objective) style
Precise and concise language
Correct referencing & quotes
Accuracy (in grammar, punctuation and syntax)
Official Style
Euphemistic
Noun Style
Impersonal constructions with the passive voice
Takes time to get going
Built from “is” plus prepositional phrases.
In other words, the Official Style is Academic (formal) English that has become so complex that it is opaque and unhelpful or just tedious and uninteresting. You might also consider the humorous take on the Gunning fog index, which describes reading level 20 as something “only government sites can get away with this because you can’t ignore them” and reading level 30 as when “the government IS covering something up.” Sometimes this obfuscation of meaning can be negatively referred to as Double Speak, which was coined by George Orwell.
​Making certain information less obvious or attempting to hide responsibility is certainly one reason the official style exists; however, it also exists because more words suggest more time spent at writing and more time writing means more work for people who have to justify their jobs. The most significant reason for its existence though is simply intellectual laziness. Good, clear prose is hard work. If you disagree, then you should get busy making money on your own writing. ​
​ ​
Corporate Jargon generally follows the official style but is more euphemistic with its use of positive but empty power words rather than syntactical complexity. Consider an example from Netflix, which essentially says “sharing passwords costs us money, so we will charge more to do it.”
​
"Casual credentials sharing is becoming too expensive to ignore. Our new solution gives operators the ability to take action. Many casual users will be happy to pay an additional fee for a premium, shared service with a greater number of concurrent users. It's a great way to keep honest people honest while benefiting from an incremental revenue stream."
​
While the problem exists in academia and government, in business it has had such a negative effect on shareholder confidence that the SEC published a style guide.
​
Some Scaling Examples
You're fired.
Your position has been terminated.
Your position has been unallocated.
Your duties have been determined to be redundant.
We have a problem.
We've hit a speedbump.
We have had a few hiccups.
We're facing some headwinds.
The above examples become more official and obfuscated as they descend. Such changes might be sincere and legitimate. Saying "you're fired" is considered very negatively and should only be used when an employee has done something obvious to merit their termination.
However, the listener needs to determine the veracity, or truthfulness, of the speaker. Many workers have found they were replaced after their "position had been terminated." Additionally, the way modern corporations use euphemistic language so pervasively has caused a lose of trust with the public.
Strategies & Exercises for Solving the Problem
Richard Lanham’s Paramedic Method - (Youtube)
Purdue’s Paramedic Method & Reverse Method
Purdue’s Eliminating Wordiness
Guildford’s Gunning Fox Guide
E-PRIME (Wikipedia)
SEC’s Writing Guide
Strunk’s The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
When Formality Obfuscates
Honored Citizen or Horse Thief (AU)
Corporate Jargon - (Coffee Break)
Corporate Gibberish Generator - (Andrew Davidson)
Job Title Generator - (bullshitjob)
The Yawn Awards - (The Atlantic)
Citigroup’s Jargony Paragraph - (The Atlantic)
The Needless Complexity of Academic Writing - (The Atlantic)
